Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Crabtree (journalist) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Tom Crabtree (journalist)

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Tom Crabtree (journalist)
• Articles for deletion/Tom Crabtree (journalist) (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Tom Crabtree (journalist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A former anchor on WSPA-TV who appears to fail WP:NJOURNALIST and WP:BASIC. Coverage I'm seeing is either primary ([1] – profile from his station) or very local ([2]). He was on TV for a long time, but I don't think that makes him notable. Previous AfD closed as no consensus with one keep !vote in 2013, so would be nice to get a clearer result this time. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

• Delete a non-notable one-market broadcast journalist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:11, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
• Delete. Certainly fails WP:N based on what's in the article now, and my own (admittedly limited) searching didn't find anything better. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.